Tuesday, June 7, 2016

Globalization and Cultural impact

The term globalization is used to describe the economic, political, social and cultural changes of the world in the last odd fifty years, which was accelerated by the scientific revolution to the diminishing of national and geopolitical boundaries in an expanding transnational movement of goods, services and capital.

Globalization is not an instant movement. It is a culmination of long term process. According to scholars, they divide the entire process of globalization into two phases.

·         First stage of globalization – 1870 – 1940
·         Second stage of globalization – from 1970’s

Cultural Impacts of Globalization:

The proponents of globalization claim that it will lead to convergence of income, access to knowledge and technology, consumption power, living standards and political ideas. Adding on to that, integration of economies would lead to increase in economic growth and wealth. They also argue that more people would be able to enjoy the fruits of modernization and civilization. Critics of globalization argue that it is hegemonic, antagonistic to the poor and vulnerable and is weakening local and national economic communities and the environment.  Therefore globalization has both positive and negative impacts.

The cultural aspect of globalization is something which attained global attention recently. So I will be discussing about the cultural impact of globalization much broadly compared to Economic, Social and Political views.

Arjun Appadurai argued that globalization has produced complex interactions between different cultures. He discusses about five ‘scapes’ which influence culture and argued that these factors ensure cultural diversity and not cultural homogeneity or domination. The five scapes are about the types of movements in the form of ethnoscapes, mediascapes, technoscapes financescapes and ideoscapes.

Ø  Ethnoscape refer to flows of people such as tourists and immigrants.
Ø  Technoscape include technology that crosses boundaries.
Ø  Financescapes refer to flows of currency markets.
Ø  Mediascapes refer to mass media technology and images. 
Ø  Ideoscapes also refer to images but specifically to the political and ideological aspects.

Appadurai argues that the act of consumption represents a convergence of global and cultural processes. He further added that what we have now is something beyond a consumer revolution (revolution of consumption) in which consumption has become the principal work of late industrial society. Today we see the availability of almost all kinds of goods and services in anywhere in the world with respect to literature, cinema, music, food, clothing, accessories etc. Western culture has diffused to all parts of the world to a considerable degree. Anyhow the cultural transmission is not a one way process. The popularity of Islam and cuisines of Asian, Latin American and African in western countries is an example of two way process.

The very concept of globalization is a major challenge for existing conception of world culture. It is clearly been discussed by the political scientist Samuel P Huntington in his book ‘The Clash of Civilizations and Remaking of the World Order’. According to him, the fundamental conflict in the world will not be ideological or political. But the great divisions among humankind and the dominating source of conflict will be cultural.  He also argued that nation states will remain the most powerful actors in world affairs, but the principal conflicts of global politics will occur between nations and groups of different civilizations. The clash of civilizations will dominate global politics. He said, the fault lines between civilizations will be the battle lines of the future.

When we talk about cultural globalization the role of media and communication is also often discussed under this title. Globalization and communication are deeply tangled. There is a common agreement among the scholars that practically, there would be no globalization without media and communication. Media have a central place in globalization for three reasons.

Ø  Media corporations have increasingly globalized their operations
Ø  Global communication infrastructure facilitates global information flows.
Ø  Global media play a key role in how we view events across the world in developing shared system of meaning.

The breaking up of space and time as a result of electronic media has a lot to do with the global interaction regardless of the disparities. The contemporary method of communication was altered by the new phenomena such as participatory journalism, online communities and transnational activism organized through online networks. Globalization has resulted in a rapid growth of social relations and social organizations on the internet. The emergence of new communication through online has been influencing the minds and brains of people through social networks, movies, blogs, online open debate forum etc. Thus mass media plays a larger role in cultural diversity than in cultural standardization.

The emergence of an Americanized World is something that we saw with the growth of globalization. A converging consumer behavior and tastes with the American model as a blue print for global culture can be traced as one of the major impact of globalization on culture. The emergence of English as the dominant language in business and academic works is another example of how one culture can gain dominance in the world with power and legitimacy when economic and political forces enable the spreading of cultures and values. Ulf Hannerz used the term ‘creolization’ to symbolize the process of western cultures being transformed and re - conceptualized outside the Western world.

There are positive aspects for cultural globalization that will foster diversity when there is an interaction between boundaries leads to mixing of culture which results in pluralization. There is condensation and differentiation on ideas which brought many unique aspects of certain culture into lime light. The concept of globalization has gained popularity which would help in improving standards of life, without hampering the local tradition. Diversity itself has become a global value now which is been promoted by international organizations and movements.

Thus, Globalization has got huge impacts on cultural sphere. There is no question on the forms of ubiquitous, homogenous and hegemonic forms that spread through everyday life. However, there are also important forms of reproduction, interconnection and time-space aspect of these cultures and associated cultural practices.

Globalization is thus an ongoing syndrome. Globalization is not only about interplays between local, regional, national and global scales, but also about the interconnectedness, flows and uneven development in the world. The strategic keys that accelerated the growth of globalization were transnational corporations, technical change, governments etc. Globalization has brought not only advantages to the globe by providing large range of imported products or by raising the basic standard of living of people. But also has major impacts on the socio-political- economic and cultural realms of life by diminishing the role of state, challenging the unique culture of every society, attacking the social structures, much diversity in the global society etc. However, despite of identification of risks and opportunities of globalization, the whole phenomenon is still very difficult to predict.